Which outcome establishes an organization-wide approach to monitoring control effectiveness?

Study for the RMF Steps, Tasks, and Outcomes Test. Get ready for your exam with flashcards, multiple choice questions, and in-depth explanations. Master each step and outcome with ease!

Multiple Choice

Which outcome establishes an organization-wide approach to monitoring control effectiveness?

Explanation:
In RMF, ongoing, organization-wide monitoring of controls is driven by having a formal plan that applies across the entire organization. The best outcome is developing and implementing an organization-wide strategy for monitoring control effectiveness. This means creating a formal plan that specifies what controls to monitor, how often they are tested, what methods and data sources are used, who is responsible, and how results are reported and acted upon across all systems. With such a strategy, monitoring becomes consistent and repeatable rather than piecemeal or system-specific. It provides standard metrics, supports timely identification of gaps, and directs remediation efforts, giving management and the authorization official confidence that security controls stay effective over time. Other options don’t establish that broad, cohesive framework: prioritizing systems by impact level is more about resource allocation and risk emphasis rather than a unified monitoring approach; determining the authorization boundary defines the scope for authorization, not how controls will be monitored; identifying missions and business functions sets context but does not establish how control effectiveness will be monitored across the organization.

In RMF, ongoing, organization-wide monitoring of controls is driven by having a formal plan that applies across the entire organization. The best outcome is developing and implementing an organization-wide strategy for monitoring control effectiveness. This means creating a formal plan that specifies what controls to monitor, how often they are tested, what methods and data sources are used, who is responsible, and how results are reported and acted upon across all systems. With such a strategy, monitoring becomes consistent and repeatable rather than piecemeal or system-specific. It provides standard metrics, supports timely identification of gaps, and directs remediation efforts, giving management and the authorization official confidence that security controls stay effective over time.

Other options don’t establish that broad, cohesive framework: prioritizing systems by impact level is more about resource allocation and risk emphasis rather than a unified monitoring approach; determining the authorization boundary defines the scope for authorization, not how controls will be monitored; identifying missions and business functions sets context but does not establish how control effectiveness will be monitored across the organization.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy